The Atticism, a boutique Australian-headquarterd shop with an office in the UK, realised clients were wasting thousands of dollars on an influencer ecosystem rife with fakery and that staff were spending too much time on social media rather than traditional PR.
It still advises on how they can improve their own social activity, but won’t manage social media channels, telling clients: ‘We don’t post images to your social feeds. We don’t boost posts or go hunting for likes and shares… in fact, we don’t even want your social media logins.’
The move bucks an industry trend in which agencies are turbo-charging their social and influencer outputs and pouring more money into influencer campaigns and their own social media channels.
The agency, which has eight staff, had scaled up its social media and influencer offering in early 2018 due to increasing client demand, but half a year later ditched it altogether.
The Atticism founder and director Renae Smith told PRWeek that when she analysed how her staff were spending their time, about 80 per cent was allocated to social media and only 20 per cent on traditional PR, “which no client was ever happy with”.
Smith took the decision to cancel all of the agency’s social media work and focus on the core discipline of PR – and says she saw “the writing on the wall” for an industry that has been riddled with data privacy and brand safety scandals, with one major platform, Instagram, now trialling the removal of ‘likes’ from photo posts.
“We took a huge hit initially; our billings per month had dropped by more than half for a few months,” she said. “I was freaking out, but by February the clients that were starting to come to us were much more high profile, including the wholesaler of one the largest telcos and a major developer in Hong Kong.
“They’ve come to us purely for PR – which makes me feel good, because I believe in the power of PR and it works. We are now doing better in terms in billings than where we were before.”
Vanity metrics and fakery
The reason why The Atticism ditched social media wasn’t purely down to a drain on resources; Smith said social media campaigns – including influencer work – wasn’t effective for what clients were looking to achieve.
A reason for this is the industry’s use of vanity metrics, such as likes and followers, to measure success.
“I was working with the largest toy importer in Australia and they were throwing so much money at us for doing [social media work]. Even though I was ticking all the boxes in terms of numbers, I thought, ‘this is such a waste of money’,” Smith explained.
“The client said they wanted 1.7 million eyes on their toys, and on YouTube they want 10,000 views of their video ad and other things. We would go to an influencer programme and find micro-influencers, as well as larger ones with 50,000-100,000 followers. The influencers would be sent toys and take photos with toys in posts, which helped the campaign exceed its targets in terms of ‘views’ and ‘likes’.
“But I knew I was paying for fakery. All of the influencers were watching each others’ posts and comments. When they had 30 comments, it was the same 30 people commenting on each other’s profiles.”
Smith said she had discovered closed groups known as ‘pods’, where influencers would post a link and everybody – usually other influencers – would click on a post to ‘like’ and comment because influencers wanted to help each other get more jobs. Unlike traditional click farms, where armies of random people click on posts, these sites encourage ‘influencers’ to engage in fakery to help each other out by returning the favour.
A recent study…
